Example: Constant astigmatism equation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
Then the constant astigmatism equation is equivalent to <math>D_y - D_x + [A,B] = 0.</math> [B-M] | Then the constant astigmatism equation is equivalent to <math>D_y A - D_x B + [A,B] = 0.</math> [B-M] | ||
Lax pair reformulation | Lax pair reformulation | ||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
\psi_y = -\frac{\mu}{z} \psi_x - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\mu z_x}{z^2} \psi. | \psi_y = -\frac{\mu}{z} \psi_x - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\mu z_x}{z^2} \psi. | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 07:03, 7 December 2013
Equation
[B-M]
Zero curvature representation
Let
Then the constant astigmatism equation is equivalent to [B-M]
Lax pair reformulation
References
[B-M] H. Baran and M. Marvan, On integrability of Weingarten surfaces: a forgotten class, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor 42 (2009) 404007.