Seminar talk, 18 September 2024: Difference between revisions

From Geometry of Differential Equations
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{Talk | speaker = Pavel Bedrikovetsky | title = Exact solutions and upscaling in conservation law systems | abstract = Numerous transport processes in nature and industry are described by nxn conservation law systems u,t+f(u),x=0, u=(u1,...,un). This corresponds to upper scale, like rock or core scale in porous media, column length in chemical engineering, or multi-block scale in city transport. The micro heterogeneity at lower scales introduces x- or t-dependencies int..."
 
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
| speaker = Pavel Bedrikovetsky
| speaker = Pavel Bedrikovetsky
| title = Exact solutions and upscaling in conservation law systems
| title = Exact solutions and upscaling in conservation law systems
| abstract = Numerous transport processes in nature and industry are described by nxn conservation law systems u,t+f(u),x=0, u=(u1,...,un). This corresponds to upper scale, like rock or core scale in porous media, column length in chemical engineering, or multi-block scale in city transport. The micro heterogeneity at lower scales introduces x- or t-dependencies into the large-scale conservation law system, like f=f(u,x) or f(u,t). Often, numerical micro-scale modelling highly exceeds the available computational facilities in terms of calculation time or memory. The problem is a proper upscaling: how to "average" the micro-scale x-dependent f(u,x) to calculate the upper-scale flux f(u)?
| abstract = Numerous transport processes in nature and industry are described by <math>n\times n</math> conservation law systems <math>u_t+f(u)_x=0</math>, <math>u=(u^1,\dots,u^n)</math>. This corresponds to upper scale, like rock or core scale in porous media, column length in chemical engineering, or multi-block scale in city transport. The micro heterogeneity at lower scales introduces <math>x</math>- or <math>t</math>-dependencies into the large-scale conservation law system, like <math>f=f(u,x)</math> or <math>f(u,t)</math>. Often, numerical micro-scale modelling highly exceeds the available computational facilities in terms of calculation time or memory. The problem is a proper upscaling: how to "average" the micro-scale <math>x</math>-dependent <math>f(u,x)</math> to calculate the upper-scale flux <math>f(u)</math>?


We present general case for n=1 and several systems for n=2 and 3. The key is that the Riemann invariant at the microscale is the "flux" rather than "density". It allows for exact solutions of several 1D problems: "smoothing" of shocks and "sharpening" of rarefaction waves into shocks due to microscale x- and t-dependencies, flows in piecewise homogeneous media. It also allows formulating an upscaling algorithm based on the analytical solutions and its invariant properties.
We present general case for <math>n=1</math> and several systems for <math>n=2</math> and <math>3</math>. The key is that the Riemann invariant at the microscale is the "flux" rather than "density". It allows for exact solutions of several 1D problems: "smoothing" of shocks and "sharpening" of rarefaction waves into shocks due to microscale <math>x</math>- and <math>t</math>-dependencies, flows in piecewise homogeneous media. It also allows formulating an upscaling algorithm based on the analytical solutions and its invariant properties.
| video =  
| video =  
| slides =  
| slides =  

Revision as of 16:21, 19 August 2024

Speaker: Pavel Bedrikovetsky

Title: Exact solutions and upscaling in conservation law systems

Abstract:
Numerous transport processes in nature and industry are described by conservation law systems , . This corresponds to upper scale, like rock or core scale in porous media, column length in chemical engineering, or multi-block scale in city transport. The micro heterogeneity at lower scales introduces - or -dependencies into the large-scale conservation law system, like or . Often, numerical micro-scale modelling highly exceeds the available computational facilities in terms of calculation time or memory. The problem is a proper upscaling: how to "average" the micro-scale -dependent to calculate the upper-scale flux ?

We present general case for and several systems for and . The key is that the Riemann invariant at the microscale is the "flux" rather than "density". It allows for exact solutions of several 1D problems: "smoothing" of shocks and "sharpening" of rarefaction waves into shocks due to microscale - and -dependencies, flows in piecewise homogeneous media. It also allows formulating an upscaling algorithm based on the analytical solutions and its invariant properties.