Seminar talk, 18 March 2026: Difference between revisions

From Geometry of Differential Equations
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{Talk | speaker = Raffaele Vitolo | title = Bi-Hamiltonian systems from homogeneous operators | abstract = Many "famous" integrable systems (KdV, AKNS, dispersive water waves etc.) have a bi-Hamiltonian pair of the following form: <math>A_1 = P_1 + R_k</math> and <math>A_2 = P_2</math>, where <math>P_1</math>, <math>P_2</math> are homogeneous first-order Hamiltonian operators and <math>R_k</math> is a homogeneous Hamiltonian operator of degree (order) <math>k</math>. Th..."
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| speaker = Raffaele Vitolo
| speaker = Raffaele Vitolo
| title = Bi-Hamiltonian systems from homogeneous operators
| title = Bi-Hamiltonian systems from homogeneous operators
| abstract = Many "famous" integrable systems (KdV, AKNS, dispersive water waves etc.) have a bi-Hamiltonian pair of the following form: <math>A_1 = P_1 + R_k</math> and <math>A_2 = P_2</math>, where <math>P_1</math>, <math>P_2</math> are homogeneous first-order Hamiltonian operators and <math>R_k</math> is a homogeneous Hamiltonian operator of degree (order) <math>k</math>. The Hamiltonian property of <math>P_1</math>, <math>P_2</math> and their compatibility were given an explicit analytic form and geometric interpretation long ago (Dubrovin, Novikov, Ferapontov, Mokhov). The Hamiltonian property of <math>R_k</math> was studied in the past (Doyle, Potemin; <math>k=2,3</math>) and recently revisited with interesting results.
| abstract = Many "famous" integrable systems (KdV, AKNS, dispersive water waves, etc.) have a bi-Hamiltonian pair of the following form: <math>A_1 = P_1 + R_k</math> and <math>A_2 = P_2</math>, where <math>P_1</math>, <math>P_2</math> are homogeneous first-order Hamiltonian operators and <math>R_k</math> is a homogeneous Hamiltonian operator of degree (order) <math>k</math>. The Hamiltonian property of <math>P_1</math>, <math>P_2</math> and their compatibility were given an explicit analytic form and geometric interpretation long ago (Dubrovin, Novikov, Ferapontov, Mokhov). The Hamiltonian property of <math>R_k</math> was studied in the past (Doyle, Potemin; <math>k=2,3</math>) and recently revisited with interesting results.


In this talk, we illustrate the analytic form and some preliminary geometric interpretation of the compatibility conditions between <math>P_i</math> and <math>R_k</math>, <math>k=2,3</math>.
In this talk, we illustrate the analytic form and some preliminary geometric interpretation of the compatibility conditions between <math>P_i</math> and <math>R_k</math>, <math>k=2,3</math>.


See the recent papers {arXiv|2602.14739}, {arXiv|2407.17189}, {arXiv|2311.13932}.
See the recent papers {{arXiv|2602.14739}}, {{arXiv|2407.17189}}, {{arXiv|2311.13932}}.


Joint work with P. Lorenzoni and S. Opanasenko.
Joint work with P. Lorenzoni and S. Opanasenko.
| video =  
| video =  
| slides =  
| slides =  
| references = {arXiv|2602.14739}, {arXiv|2407.17189}, {arXiv|2311.13932}
| references = {{arXiv|2602.14739}}, {{arXiv|2407.17189}}, {{arXiv|2311.13932}}
| 79YY-MM-DD =  
| 79YY-MM-DD =  
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 14:43, 9 March 2026

Speaker: Raffaele Vitolo

Title: Bi-Hamiltonian systems from homogeneous operators

Abstract:
Many "famous" integrable systems (KdV, AKNS, dispersive water waves, etc.) have a bi-Hamiltonian pair of the following form: A1=P1+Rk and A2=P2, where P1, P2 are homogeneous first-order Hamiltonian operators and Rk is a homogeneous Hamiltonian operator of degree (order) k. The Hamiltonian property of P1, P2 and their compatibility were given an explicit analytic form and geometric interpretation long ago (Dubrovin, Novikov, Ferapontov, Mokhov). The Hamiltonian property of Rk was studied in the past (Doyle, Potemin; k=2,3) and recently revisited with interesting results.

In this talk, we illustrate the analytic form and some preliminary geometric interpretation of the compatibility conditions between Pi and Rk, k=2,3.

See the recent papers arXiv:2602.14739, arXiv:2407.17189, arXiv:2311.13932.

Joint work with P. Lorenzoni and S. Opanasenko.

References:
arXiv:2602.14739, arXiv:2407.17189, arXiv:2311.13932